Why does Machiavelli liken Fortune to a woman?

In the minds of most Renaissance writers, as well as the classical writers they emulated, Fortune, or "Fortuna," was gendered female. In fact, Fortuna was the Roman goddess of luck and chance, a fact of which Machiavelli, a classicist through and through, was keenly aware. So Machiavelli is by no means being original, nor notably sexist, by referring to Fortune with a feminine pronoun. Like most of his contemporaries, Machiavelli would have believed that women were more fickle, spiteful, and irrational than men. This belief, which of course is part and parcel of a patriarchal society, is probably why the Romans associated fortune with the feminine. Machiavelli, though, takes this gendered view of fortune much further:

Fortune is a woman, and if you wish to keep her under it is necessary to beat and ill-use her; and it is seen that she allows herself to be mastered by the adventurous rather than by those who go to work more coldly. She is, therefore, always, woman-like, a lover of young men, because they are less cautious, more violent, and with more audacity command her.

The misogynistic attitude expressed in this passage is a direct consequence of Machiavelli's understanding of fortune, which he views as a destructive, almost evil, force that can nevertheless be restrained through force. Elsewhere in this chapter, he compares fortune to a flood that destroys everything, and he points to examples of leaders who did not wait for fortune to bring them to their knees, but rather took bold action to assert their will. It reveals much about contemporary attitudes about gender that he drew parallels between this aggressive approach and a man's relationship with a woman.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/machiavelli/

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm


To Machiavelli, fortune or luck, like a woman, is fickle: it is unreliable and changeable. You can't depend on it. It will betray you.
Machiavelli is leaning into some unfortunate Renaissance stereotypes about women—the same stereotypes that led Othello to kill Desdemona in Shakespeare's Othello. Women in that time period were often regarded by men as unfaithful, a stereotype that had more to do with men's projections and misunderstandings of women than with women themselves. Nevertheless, Machiavelli uses the comparison because he expects men to understand it in a personal way: the light bulb should turn on in their minds as they grasp fortune's likeness to women.
"Fortune," in this period, was often depicted as a wheel, hence the term "wheel of fortune." It was ever turning, so that even if a person was on the top today, eventually the wheel would crush him as it turned. Machiavelli, therefore, advises princes not to think their fortune will last forever, but to take precautions and work to hedge their bets as far as possible. Just as a man should try to control a woman rather than take chances with her unpredictable nature, so should a prince cautiously treat fortune.


In chapter 25 of The Prince Machiavelli infamously describes fortune as being like a woman. Fortune is a very important concept for Machiavelli; it's crucial for a successful ruler to learn how to master it. That's not to say that fortune can ever be controlled any more than you can control a river. But just as you can divert the course of a river or build a dam to prevent it from causing flooding, so too can the potentially damaging consequences of fortune be mitigated by taking wise precautions.
In doing so, it's always better to be bold rather than timid. After all, fortune favors the brave, as they say. Adopting such an approach does not guarantee success, of course, but it does increase one's chances. Fortune was often portrayed in Renaissance art as a female figure, forever spinning her wheel (the wheel of fortune, no less). At that time, the prevailing attitude towards women was completely at odds with what's considered acceptable today. Then, it was widely believed that women were physically and intellectually weaker than men and therefore needed to be kept firmly under the control of their husbands, brothers, and fathers. Fortune, according to Machiavelli, must be treated the exact same way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How does Bilbo show leadership and courage in The Hobbit?

Bilbo’s increase in confidence and courage is the defining aspect of his character arc. At the beginning of the novel, he is shut away content in his Hobbit hole, happy to remain separate and coddled from the rest of the world. In the movie, Bilbo chooses to join the dwarves on their quest out of a sense for adventure. In the book, however, Bilbo wants nothing to do with them and only joins because he had been duped into signing a contract. Despite being on the adventure somewhat against his will, Bilbo still proves himself time and again, saving the dwarves from the spiders, the trolls, and a number of other dangers they encounter along the way. Bilbo’s character arc has even been cited as a sort of Christian metaphor for the growth of the soul, though how much Tolkien intended on this front is up for debate. From a thematic standpoint, the ring of invisibility also plays into Bilbo’s brand of bravery. If Hobbits are the overlooked creatures of Middle Earth, then it is noteworthy that...
Read more

In “Goodbye to All That,” Joan Didion writes that the “lesson” of her story is that “it is distinctly possible to remain too long at the fair.” What does she mean? How does the final section of the essay portray how she came to this understanding, her feelings about it, and the consequences of it?

In this classic essay, Didion describes moving to New York City from her native Sacramento at the age of twenty-one, and, as she freely admits, a somewhat naive twenty-one, her mind, "programmed by all the movies I had ever seen and all the songs I had ever heard about New York," with the typical feeling, at that age, that, "nothing like this...has ever happened to anyone before." Intending to stay for only six months, she falls in love with the city. As she says, "I do not mean 'love' in any colloquial way, I mean that I was in love with the city the way you love the first person who ever touches you and never love anyone quite that way again." This initial love led her to prolong her residency, since, "I still believed in possibilities then, still had the sense, so peculiar to New York, that something extraordinary would happen any minute, any day, any month." But as the next years roll past, and the "new faces" she encounters...
Read more

Why does the poet say "all the men and women merely players"?

It's one of the most famous lines in literature: All the world's a stage,And all the men and women merely players . . . This famous saying comes from Shakespeare's play As You Like It, and it's spoken by Jacques. What he's saying here is that simply going about our daily lives is a type of performance. Just like actors on a stage, we all have roles to perform: Daughter. Student. Sister. Captain of the soccer team. The fact that Shakespeare writes that men and women are merely players suggests that the roles are preordained and that a person's choice in being a mother, for example, or a doctor or starting point guard for the Brooklyn Nets is out of their hands. What roles a person performs over the course of their lifetime is up to fate. The notion that "all the world's a stage" has entered pop culture, but within the context of the play, this idea does not sit well with Jacques. He's a pessimist, and the idea that everything is up to fate makes...
Read more