How did humanism impact science, religion, and art during the Renaissance?

Humanism had two main components during the Renaissance. One was a turn to classical (i.e., ancient Greek and Roman) literature and values. The other was the glorification of humankind itself, a departure from medieval thought, which emphasized the depravity of man. We can see the first, for example, in the work of Machiavelli, who looked back to history in order to find examples of how republics and other forms of government had risen and fallen. We can also see it in the renewed use of such classical Roman architectural forms as domes in, for example, the cathedral at Florence, designed by Brunelleschi. In terms of the glorification of man, we can read Pico della Mirandola's "Oration on the Dignity of Man," a profoundly humanist document in every way. He argued that man, as the creation of God, was a miracle to be celebrated:

[M]an is the most fortunate of living things and, consequently, deserving of all admiration; of what may be the condition in the hierarchy of beings assigned to him, which draws upon him the envy, not of the brutes alone, but of the astral beings and of the very intelligences which dwell beyond the confines of the world. 

Renaissance-era painters and sculptors similarly celebrated mankind, creating works (think Michelangelo's David) that glorified the human form even as they portrayed biblical themes. But we can also see its influence in religion--both Martin Luther and John Calvin were deeply read in humanist thinking, and though their theology was not exactly consistent with humanist values, their critique of the Catholic Church was. Similarly, Erasmus, though no Protestant, launched a thorough critique of the Church using humanist devices in Praise of Folly.
Renaissance-era scientists revisited, revised, and ultimately overturned much of classical thinking. Galileo, for instance, demonstrated that Aristotle's understanding of motion was incorrect. Aristotle and other classical thinkers thought that objects remained at rest unless acted upon by an outside force. Galileo (and Newton) showed that the opposite was true--objects stayed in motion unless acted on by an outside force. Overall, however, the critical view of the world espoused by classical thinkers was revived by Renaissance-era scientists.
https://www.history.com/topics/renaissance/renaissance-art

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How does Bilbo show leadership and courage in The Hobbit?

Bilbo’s increase in confidence and courage is the defining aspect of his character arc. At the beginning of the novel, he is shut away content in his Hobbit hole, happy to remain separate and coddled from the rest of the world. In the movie, Bilbo chooses to join the dwarves on their quest out of a sense for adventure. In the book, however, Bilbo wants nothing to do with them and only joins because he had been duped into signing a contract. Despite being on the adventure somewhat against his will, Bilbo still proves himself time and again, saving the dwarves from the spiders, the trolls, and a number of other dangers they encounter along the way. Bilbo’s character arc has even been cited as a sort of Christian metaphor for the growth of the soul, though how much Tolkien intended on this front is up for debate. From a thematic standpoint, the ring of invisibility also plays into Bilbo’s brand of bravery. If Hobbits are the overlooked creatures of Middle Earth, then it is noteworthy that...
Read more

In “Goodbye to All That,” Joan Didion writes that the “lesson” of her story is that “it is distinctly possible to remain too long at the fair.” What does she mean? How does the final section of the essay portray how she came to this understanding, her feelings about it, and the consequences of it?

In this classic essay, Didion describes moving to New York City from her native Sacramento at the age of twenty-one, and, as she freely admits, a somewhat naive twenty-one, her mind, "programmed by all the movies I had ever seen and all the songs I had ever heard about New York," with the typical feeling, at that age, that, "nothing like this...has ever happened to anyone before." Intending to stay for only six months, she falls in love with the city. As she says, "I do not mean 'love' in any colloquial way, I mean that I was in love with the city the way you love the first person who ever touches you and never love anyone quite that way again." This initial love led her to prolong her residency, since, "I still believed in possibilities then, still had the sense, so peculiar to New York, that something extraordinary would happen any minute, any day, any month." But as the next years roll past, and the "new faces" she encounters...
Read more

Why does the poet say "all the men and women merely players"?

It's one of the most famous lines in literature: All the world's a stage,And all the men and women merely players . . . This famous saying comes from Shakespeare's play As You Like It, and it's spoken by Jacques. What he's saying here is that simply going about our daily lives is a type of performance. Just like actors on a stage, we all have roles to perform: Daughter. Student. Sister. Captain of the soccer team. The fact that Shakespeare writes that men and women are merely players suggests that the roles are preordained and that a person's choice in being a mother, for example, or a doctor or starting point guard for the Brooklyn Nets is out of their hands. What roles a person performs over the course of their lifetime is up to fate. The notion that "all the world's a stage" has entered pop culture, but within the context of the play, this idea does not sit well with Jacques. He's a pessimist, and the idea that everything is up to fate makes...
Read more