Why did the Thirteen Colonies revolt?

The American colonies revolted over what they perceived to be a lack of disrespect for their rights as British subjects. Britain practiced salutary neglect towards the colonies for years, thus granting them a bit of self-rule unofficially, as the colonists often found ways around following the British navigation acts and British taxation laws. After the French and Indian War, Britain sought to tighten its controls on the American colonies in order to strengthen the treasury. The colonists revolted as they stated that they were not represented in Parliament. Parliament countered that they were not a representative body and that they had a rightful duty to tax British subjects wherever they lived.
The American colonies also revolted against British punishments. After the French and Indian War, violators of the Navigation Acts could now be tried in front of Admiralty courts. This meant the lack of a jury trial. Britain also closed down the port of Boston and stationed troops there with the Quartering Act in retaliation for the Boston Tea Party. By the time of the Revolution, the colonists viewed Britain less as a benevolent mother country and more as a controlling government that did not have their best interests at heart.


There were several reasons why the colonists revolted against Great Britain. The three most important factors were taxes, control, and bloodshed.
TaxesThe British Parliament passed two tax laws that upset the colonists. Both the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts violated the rights of the colonists, in their opinion. They believed that they needed to have representatives in Parliament who could speak about and vote on proposed tax laws. The colonists didn’t have representatives in Parliament. As a result, the colonists believed their rights were being violated.
ControlWhen Parliament passed the Proclamation of 1763, the colonists weren’t allowed to go to the lands that Great Britain gained from France in the French and Indian War. The colonists weren’t happy about this. To make matters worse, the colonists had to provide housing and supplies for the British soldiers that were enforcing this unpopular law.
BloodshedAt the Boston Massacre, five colonists were killed. For some people, this was an important turning point in the relationship with Great Britain. After the Boston Tea Party, the British passed the Intolerable Acts, which the colonists refused to obey. When the British moved their troops to Lexington and Concord in April 1775, soldiers on both sides were killed. For many people, it was only a matter of time before the colonists would declare their independence from Great Britain. With the publication of Common Sense, a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine explaining why the colonists should declare their independence from Great Britain, more people were convinced that independence was justified.
There were many reasons why the colonists rebelled against Great Britain.
https://dailyhistory.org/Why_Did_American_Colonists_Become_United_Against_England%3F

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How does Bilbo show leadership and courage in The Hobbit?

Bilbo’s increase in confidence and courage is the defining aspect of his character arc. At the beginning of the novel, he is shut away content in his Hobbit hole, happy to remain separate and coddled from the rest of the world. In the movie, Bilbo chooses to join the dwarves on their quest out of a sense for adventure. In the book, however, Bilbo wants nothing to do with them and only joins because he had been duped into signing a contract. Despite being on the adventure somewhat against his will, Bilbo still proves himself time and again, saving the dwarves from the spiders, the trolls, and a number of other dangers they encounter along the way. Bilbo’s character arc has even been cited as a sort of Christian metaphor for the growth of the soul, though how much Tolkien intended on this front is up for debate. From a thematic standpoint, the ring of invisibility also plays into Bilbo’s brand of bravery. If Hobbits are the overlooked creatures of Middle Earth, then it is noteworthy that...
Read more

In “Goodbye to All That,” Joan Didion writes that the “lesson” of her story is that “it is distinctly possible to remain too long at the fair.” What does she mean? How does the final section of the essay portray how she came to this understanding, her feelings about it, and the consequences of it?

In this classic essay, Didion describes moving to New York City from her native Sacramento at the age of twenty-one, and, as she freely admits, a somewhat naive twenty-one, her mind, "programmed by all the movies I had ever seen and all the songs I had ever heard about New York," with the typical feeling, at that age, that, "nothing like this...has ever happened to anyone before." Intending to stay for only six months, she falls in love with the city. As she says, "I do not mean 'love' in any colloquial way, I mean that I was in love with the city the way you love the first person who ever touches you and never love anyone quite that way again." This initial love led her to prolong her residency, since, "I still believed in possibilities then, still had the sense, so peculiar to New York, that something extraordinary would happen any minute, any day, any month." But as the next years roll past, and the "new faces" she encounters...
Read more

Why does the poet say "all the men and women merely players"?

It's one of the most famous lines in literature: All the world's a stage,And all the men and women merely players . . . This famous saying comes from Shakespeare's play As You Like It, and it's spoken by Jacques. What he's saying here is that simply going about our daily lives is a type of performance. Just like actors on a stage, we all have roles to perform: Daughter. Student. Sister. Captain of the soccer team. The fact that Shakespeare writes that men and women are merely players suggests that the roles are preordained and that a person's choice in being a mother, for example, or a doctor or starting point guard for the Brooklyn Nets is out of their hands. What roles a person performs over the course of their lifetime is up to fate. The notion that "all the world's a stage" has entered pop culture, but within the context of the play, this idea does not sit well with Jacques. He's a pessimist, and the idea that everything is up to fate makes...
Read more