Can someone give me a detailed analysis of the character Colonel Calloway in the novel The Third Man by Graham Greene?

Colonel Calloway is the narrator of The Third Man. He is a former Scotland Yard detective who was made a colonel in the British army. Right away, the reader knows he is a rational man, as he says the following:

Rollo Martins believed in friendship, and that was why what happened later was a worse shock to him than it would have been to you or me (you because you would have put it down to an illusion and me because at once a rational explanation—however wrongly—would have come to my mind) (9-10).

Immediately after meeting Martins, a novelist, Calloway understands Martin's motivations. Unlike the romantic Martins, Calloway is a realist, a person who likes to look at the facts in an unbiased way.
Calloway is perceptive and a close observer, and he is able to wheedle information out of Martins. He asks questions about Lime's childhood and probes him by saying, "That sounds like a cheap novelette," (22) after Martins praises Lime. Calloway says, "I was anxious to vex him—one learns a lot that way" (22). In other words, Calloway, a careful observer of others, knows how to pump Martins for information, and he can make Martins annoyed so that Martins shares what he knows. Calloway is a seasoned detective and a person who knows how to get the truth out of others.
Later, in return for Martins telling him some information, Calloway tells him that Harry Lime was a racketeer who was involved in selling watered-down penicillin that caused the deaths of children. This information is a shock to Martins. While Martins is an idealistic character who becomes unwittingly involved in the intrigue of broken-down postwar Vienna, Calloway is a more hard-boiled, realistic character who sees clearly who Lime was and who destroys Martins's idealism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How does Bilbo show leadership and courage in The Hobbit?

In “Goodbye to All That,” Joan Didion writes that the “lesson” of her story is that “it is distinctly possible to remain too long at the fair.” What does she mean? How does the final section of the essay portray how she came to this understanding, her feelings about it, and the consequences of it?

Why does the poet say "all the men and women merely players"?