What is Nick's role in a conflict in The Great Gatsby?

I would say that Nick's role in the conflict is merely that of an observer. Nick is involved in the conflict, but is never really the cause or mediator of that conflict. I am of the opinion that if Nick had played a more active role in the conflict, the outcome of the novel would likely have been quite different. He could have had a greater impact on the novel and possibly saved the others from unnecessary pain and suffering. For example, had Nick been more involved in his cousin Daisy's life, he may have been able to help her and Tom resolve their marital issues. As a result, Daisy would probably never have killed Myrtle, thereby indirectly saving Gatsby's life.


I would classify the main conflict of this novel as one of character versus society; Nick, the protagonist, conflicts with society, represented by people like Tom and Daisy Buchanan, and even Jordan Baker, as a result of their selfishness and "carelessness." They are rich and, therefore, have the privilege of being able to smash "up things and creatures and then [retreat] back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together and let other people clean up the mess they had made." And though Nick does seem to harbor some romantic feelings for Jordan, even in the end after all the drama between Tom and Gatsby, he ultimately cannot enter into a truly committed relationship with Jordan because of his misgivings about her. These individuals, representative of society's values, are deceptive, materialistic, and selfish, and Nick conflicts with them as a result.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How does Bilbo show leadership and courage in The Hobbit?

In “Goodbye to All That,” Joan Didion writes that the “lesson” of her story is that “it is distinctly possible to remain too long at the fair.” What does she mean? How does the final section of the essay portray how she came to this understanding, her feelings about it, and the consequences of it?

Why does the poet say "all the men and women merely players"?