How would you write the number 3.000052 in scientific notation?

The purpose of scientific notation is to write a non-zero number with a lot of digits to a shortened version of the number with less digits. Scientific notation is expressed as a x 10^n where a is more than 1 and less than 10 and n is any integer (positive and negative whole numbers and 0).

For the number 3.000052, it's already more than 1 and less than 10 so we can set a as 3.000052 but we still have to figure out what n is. If n=1 then we would have 3.000052 x 10^1 which is the same as 3.000052 x 10 which is 30.00052, which isn't what we want. Instead we make n=0 which makes 10^0=1 because any number raised to the 0 power is 1. Therefore we have,

3.000052 x 10^0 = 3.000052 x 1 = 3.000052.

So your final answer is 3.000052 x 10^0.


In scientific notation, a real number x is written as a * 10^n. Here n must be an integer (positive, negative or zero) and a must be a real number (positive or negative) with the absolute value between 1 and 10 (excluding 10).
Only nonzero numbers can be written in scientific notation.
Now, let's look at the given number. If it is x =3.000052, then it is already in the scientific notation, with n = 0 and a =3.000052.
Because of this, I suppose that leading "3." is the number of your question, and the number is actually .000052, or 0.000052. In this case, we need to multiply it by 100000 = 10^5 to come up with a value of abetween 1 and 10: 5.2. To come up with our value for n, we switch the sign of the exponent on 10 that we have just used; since we multiplied our original number by 10^5, n is -5, and the scientific notation of 0.000052 is 5.2 * 10^(-5).
https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/scientific-notation.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How does Bilbo show leadership and courage in The Hobbit?

In “Goodbye to All That,” Joan Didion writes that the “lesson” of her story is that “it is distinctly possible to remain too long at the fair.” What does she mean? How does the final section of the essay portray how she came to this understanding, her feelings about it, and the consequences of it?

Why does the poet say "all the men and women merely players"?